// you’re reading...

philosophical

living on one income - the single life

WSA adsense code -->

I find it amusing when you see calculators designed to justify one parent in a family staying at home. Not because that’s not a worthy goal if it suits you, but because they are about how you can live on one income. And I live on one income. But that’s because I’m single.

Now, I’m assuming that some of the challenges of supporting multiple people on one income are significantly greater than supporting a single person on one income. It seems reasonable that there will be higher food bills, somewhat higher utility bills, and possibly (although not necessarily) higher housing costs.

On the other hand, there are perceived advantages to having a stay at home adult in the household, that don’t apply to single people. From three hierarchies

…a single-income family can respond to a loss of the breadwinner’s income (for whatever reason: death, injury, laid-off, fired, etc.) by sending the other parent into the paid labor force. Dual-income families don’t have that option…

Single income single person families don’t have this option either. Nor do they have someone to pick up the slack in the housework department, or to run errands in working hours.

Although there might be smaller bills, it’s harder to be more creatively frugal when you don’t have all that much time - not really even as much as a dual income household, where there are at least two busy people to do the work instead of one. There is also often an unwritten assumption that because you are single, you have plenty of time to help people out. Hmmm, not so much.

Some of the difficulties are shared. The Two Income Trap argues that middle class two income families have driven up housing prices and made single income living much more difficult as you have to pay for a lot of house on your budget. That’s as true for single person families as it is for multiple person families.

To a greater extent than in a larger family, single income, single adult living isn’t really a choice. I can’t just decide to be in a dual income household. It’s a pity that it is so expensive - most people live a single life at some point, and more than half of everyone finishes up their days being a single person household.

Don’t get me wrong, I do enjoy my single life, it has many advantages, but it is more expensive than being in a dual income household.

Similar Posts:

If you like what you're reading, why not leave a comment below, subscribe to my feed, or check out some of my best posts.

Discussion

33 comments for “living on one income - the single life”

  1. What you describe is the rationale behind the “marriage (tax) penalty” here in the U.S. Married couples pay more in taxes than a single person who makes the same amount would. I nearly had a heart attack the first year we were married because I’d always gotten a refund, and yet now we owed $2000!

    Posted by Chief Family Officer | February 21, 2008, 1:23 pm
  2. I’m not a fan of that - we have taxation on individuals, not on households over here. It doesn’t matter whether you are married or single, you are taxed on your own income.

    Posted by plonkee | February 21, 2008, 1:57 pm
  3. I had been supporting myself for quite some time before getting married last year. And I agree with you whole-heartedly. Two incomes are better than one. Many of the costs stay the same (heat, phone, mortgage)yet you have twice the money.

    Lisa

    Posted by Lisa | February 21, 2008, 2:56 pm
  4. I just got married this year as well, and completely agree. Being a single homeowner working full time is hard work!
    My husband and I sold my house when we got married and I moved into his. Now, I never have to find time to shovel the driveway (snow) and he never has to go grocery shopping! I don’t have to do dishes and he doesn’t have to do laundry. It really is a time saver and gives both of us more free time to relax together!
    As an added bonus, 100% of my income goes into savings (we combine all of our finances)!

    Posted by Becky@FamilyandFinances | February 21, 2008, 3:30 pm
  5. Two incomes definitely better than one, Lisa, as long as you’re DINKs. But child-care adds a huge cost, which makes it time to re-evaluate. IMO.

    Single parents get the shortest end of the stake here. At least plonkee doesn’t have to pay for babysitting and such.

    Posted by Mrs. Micah | February 21, 2008, 3:34 pm
  6. @Mrs. Micah:
    Too true, single parenting is probably the most expensive. I think there are lots of things that you should/would re-evaluate if you have kids, of course re-evaluating doesn’t necessarily mean that you should switch to one income it entirely depends on what you both get out of work (both monetarily and in intangibles).

    Posted by plonkee | February 21, 2008, 4:10 pm
  7. Very nice article, thought I’d write a follow-up to it.

    I don’t even remember what it was like to be single anymore. Been too long, and I wasn’t single that long to begin with. Now MARRIED, I’ve got down cold!

    Posted by Randall at CreditWithdrawal | February 21, 2008, 5:36 pm
  8. Parenting as a whole is very expensive. Some cost are obvious, like groceries, others happen like Ninja Bills, clothes, scholl etc..

    Single Parents have it very rough.

    Posted by RacerX | February 21, 2008, 6:56 pm
  9. Don’t forget the whole going on holiday issue where we have to pay a twice as much as eveything is set up as twin share!

    Posted by debtdieter | February 21, 2008, 7:35 pm
  10. Interesting post.

    I’ve done the single thing and now I’m doing the married thing and I can tell you from a financial point of view, singles have it tough.

    Whether you have a house/apartment, car etc couples can share so much more.

    Mike

    Posted by FourPillars | February 21, 2008, 8:36 pm
  11. I’m in the middle of buying a condo and I hadn’t actually thought about how unusual it is for a single person to buy real-estate - until everything I signed had lines for two buyers!

    Posted by Julie | February 21, 2008, 9:31 pm
  12. Right on!

    The amount of extra WORK a single person has to do to maintain life is what strikes me. When you have to do everything from tending the yard to repairing the toilet to schlepping the dog to the vet to buying groceries to fixing food, your life is chuckablock full of chores, with little or no time left for loafing or going out.

    And what seems like a pretty good salary is less so when you’re not sharing some of the overhead with another person.

    I suspect a friend who earns about what I do thinks I’m pretty chintzy because I won’t hire her housekeeper for $80 a hit (yipe!) and because I don’t entertain a lot. She has a partner who splits those costs with her — alone, I flat can’t afford them.

    On the other hand…heh heh!…it’s pretty nice to be free to do what you want to do (or don’t want to do) when you please.

    Posted by Funny about Money | February 22, 2008, 5:42 am
  13. Hi Plonkee - I’ve been away from your blog for a little while with work. Glad to see you’re still plugging away at it!

    We are a single income household with 2 young children, and it is pretty tough. For us it makes sense because 1)my wife is able to work on house improvements (she’s a faux painter and interior designer), so in a sense she is earning equity for us even though its not cash in pocket, and 2) the cost of child care is prohibitive.

    As a result, I have a day job (working at home) and I supplement that income with programming and writing gigs where I can get them to fit my schedule. But my wife’s contribution has been extremely lucrative - the improvements on the last house turned into significant gains for us when we sold.

    Posted by metroknow | February 22, 2008, 8:40 am
  14. My ex-boyfriend once commented on how his oldest brother was able to amass significant savings because he wasn’t married. It seems the brother viewed a wife as an expense. After some discussion, I was able to convince my ex that having a spouse could be of financial benefit, much like having a roommate. Obviously, having kids and potentially having a spouse stay home with them changes things, as would a large income disparity since, if, say, you made $200,000 and a year and your spouse made $20,000 you’d probably choose a lifestyle a bit more lavish than strictly equal contributions would allow.

    Posted by E.C. | February 23, 2008, 2:49 am
  15. there seems to be a growing trend for flat sharing now (in London anyway). I’ve noticed it more and more among my peers (I’m 37) and I’ve just started flat sharing myself - last time I did this was when I was in University.

    And its actually working out really well.

    Posted by Angell | February 24, 2008, 8:26 am
  16. Like Angell, I am totally cheating by having a housemate. I am 45 and have only lived alone once for about six months (until my sister moved in) plus a couple of months between roommates (while I have a recovery/self rediscovery period).

    With a roommate, not only do I pay only half the rent and just over half the utilities (the utilities would be lower in the summer if it were just me, lower in winter if it were just him), I also have someone to talk to without having to go out. I also have access to lots of fine reading materials, DVDs, and guitar music. Also, I have never bought a couch.

    Posted by Debbie M | February 26, 2008, 10:10 pm
  17. @Debbie M:
    I wish I’d never had to buy a couch. I lived with what I can only describe as a succession of the worlds worst sofas for the last 10 years. The current one isn’t getting replaced yet because I have other priorities, and it’s perfectly serviceable, but I do not like it one little bit.

    Posted by plonkee | February 26, 2008, 10:33 pm
  18. Thanks for posting this. I am always a bit envious when two-income households wake up, smell the debt, buckle down, and pay it off fairly quickly. I’ve been pretty good about debt, and am fairly conscientious about my spending. I definitely have room for improvement, but not as much spare money as I might if I had a financial partner!

    Posted by bethh | February 27, 2008, 12:45 am
  19. @bethh:
    It is definitely easier for 2 people together to pay down debt, I guess the difficulty comes in ensuring that both parties want to do so.

    Posted by plonkee | February 27, 2008, 7:07 am
  20. Interesting post. I think your right on target when you’re thinking about a two income two person family. When a family goes from two to three things change though.

    Many things (food, entertainment, vacation, clothing, etc) become more expensive when you add more than two.

    Also, as a single adult you have the option of a room/flat mate.

    Posted by sara l | March 3, 2008, 12:31 am
  21. Actually, there is currently no marriage penalty in the US tax code. That was fixed.

    I’m single, single income, live on my own, no kids. Good salary. Life is good.

    Agree with you about chores/errands. My solution: lower my standards for housekeeping (because I’m never there anyway). Run errands during my lunch hour or on the way home from work. Automate as much as possible.

    Posted by kentuckyliz | March 3, 2008, 12:53 pm
  22. Oh yeah, my housekeeping standards are pretty low. There just aren’t enough hours in the day to get everything done. As long as it’s not a health hazard, who cares?

    Posted by plonkee | March 3, 2008, 3:47 pm
  23. im 19 and im looking at moving out on my own i only earn 200 pounds a week after tax and i need to drive to manchester from burnley erery day to work (about 50 miles there and back a day), i dont have much furniture and running a car and travelling expences mean i dont have any money to do anything else, i tried looking for benefits but im really struggling to find any as im quite new to this and not really sre what im looking for, if anyone has any help or advice it would be much appreciated, my email adress is

    Posted by chris | January 12, 2009, 12:17 pm
  24. My husband is (and always has been) very much of the school of thought that two incomes are better than one. As I, myself, happen to enjoy having a career, I have never disagreed with him on this point. In the current economy, however, I am leaning more and more toward trying to convince him to buckle down and have one of us remain at home with the children to alleviate childcare costs, convenience food costs, and expensive commuting costs. I’m glad I’m not a singlton anymore. Many judos to you for managing it on your own without the option available to have it any other way.

    Posted by Nicole | March 3, 2009, 1:33 am
  25. Personally, I don’t think staying single is the only option. You can actually save enough money for your future family in order to avoid tax problems.

    Posted by Estate Tax | November 20, 2009, 8:49 am
  26. Really great post and the step by step approach! Thank you for creating the tutorial.

    Posted by payday loans | June 10, 2010, 11:52 pm
  27. Supra Vulk, Supra Vulk
    Supra Shoes Cruizer, Supra Shoes

    Cruizer
    Supra Shoes Cuban, Supra Shoes

    Cuban

    Posted by Supra Shoes Cuban | July 9, 2010, 3:05 am
  28. We took the decision to live on one income when our eldest child was born ten years ago. It’s been, and still is, a struggle sometimes as the cost of living sky rockets, but the benefit of knowing that the kids have our attention and are not being cared for by strangers makes up for it for us.

    Posted by Sarkari Naukri | December 13, 2010, 3:50 pm

Post a comment

NETWORK
Proud member of the