Lately I’ve been hanging out at the forums on money saving expert. As I mentioned in my review, IMO they aren’t the best feature of the site, in part because the articles are so good, but also because two or three prolific members hate index funds.
I probably shouldn’t pick on them, but i will anyway. Their main arguments seem to be thus:
- a FTSE All-Share tracker is not sufficiently diversified
- a tracker will not beat the average in its sector by design
- if the market crashes by 40% you will lose money
I say that they are wrong. In answer to these points I have my own:
- no single fund is truly diversified but a FTSE All-Share tracker is well diversified in its sector (since it holds shares in all the companies in its sector)
- a tracker will by designÂ perform noÂ worse than average
- if the market crashes you will probably lose money anyway, this is why you invest over a 10 year time period
Its been stated before, but index funds have another huge advantage: they are cheap.
One of my biggest complaints about the index fund naysayers is that they often state that pursuing average returns is a poor idea. Quite frankly, I doubt my ability to consistently pick a fund that will perform above average when professional fund managers cannot pick stocks and shares that perform above average. Therefore I go for the simpler option, I simply go for the average – note that I’m not aiming for the average, I’m actuallyÂ getting the average in my sector (minus fees, which as stated above, are low). I think that’s a perfectly reasonable strategy.
Â If you are earning and investing in Â£ sterling, you could do a lot worse than make use of an index tracker like a FTSE All-Share tracker for your UK Equities investments. They’re cheap and theyÂ won’t perform worse than the average.
Similar Posts:subscribe to my feed, or check out some of my best posts.